Posted: 23 Oct 2008 12:16 PM CDT
John McCain has a new video release, powerful with ordinary working Americans fighting for their piece of the American dream and one specific comment from one of the people speaking in the video says that "Obama's plan is a tax on the American Dream".
The video is 1 minute 30 seconds long, found at YouTube here and shown below:
Posted: 23 Oct 2008 11:27 AM CDT
Examples of the medias attempt to influence the presidential election has been shown numerous times, here and elsewhere online, but Pew Research takes it a step further and shows exactly how in the tank the media is for Barack Obama.
For Obama during this period, just over a third of the stories were clearly positive in tone (36%), while a similar number (35%) were neutral or mixed. A smaller number (29%) were negative.
Journalism.org shows that Palin, unlike what the media likes to report, has not been a drag on the McCain/Palin ticket at all:
As for Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, her coverage had an up and down trajectory, moving from quite positive, to very negative, to more mixed. What drove that tone toward a more unfavorable light was probing her public record and her encounters with the press. Little of her trouble came from coverage of her personal traits or family issues. In the end, she also received less than half the coverage of either presidential nominee, though about triple that of her vice presidential counterpart, Joe Biden.
Thanks to reader Kim R, we also see that despite the media's obvious attempts to harm John McCain in favor of Barack Obama, the IBD/TIPP Tracking Poll, which in 2004, the Final Certified Results for TIPP showed them to be the "most accurate pollster of the campaign season", has the polling numbers far closer than has been reported to date.
IBD/TIPP Poll shows a sudden tightening of Obama's lead to 3.7 from 6.0. McCain has picked up 3 points in the West and with independents, married women and those with some college. He's also gaining momentum in the suburbs, where he's gone from dead even a week ago to a 20-point lead.
Looks like despite the media trying to insist to everyone that the race is over, the voters and respondents of the polls know the media is in the tank for Obama according to another Pew Research piece titled "Most Voters Say News Media Wants Obama to Win."
Voters overwhelmingly believe that the media wants Barack Obama to win the presidential election. By a margin of 70%-9%, Americans say most journalists want to see Obama, not John McCain, win on Nov. 4. Another 8% say journalists don't favor either candidate, and 13% say they don't know which candidate most reporters support.
Get out and vote, it does count. The voters are on to the media's game, their bias and their lies.
Posted: 23 Oct 2008 11:27 AM CDT
ZombieTime has managed to get their hands on a copy of William Ayers' book Prairie Fire to which they uploaded and provide some very interesting passages.
Furthermore: Obama and his supporters at first claimed he barely knew who Ayers was, but when public awareness of the connections between Obama and Ayers became too numerous and too strong to deny, Obama's supporters have now begun resorting to a fallback position: that William Ayers wasn't such a bad guy after all, and that it is no shame to be associated with him.
They also provide proof that Ayers is the one who wrote the book, Prairie Fire... Ayers himself admits it.
These are simply teasers from ZombieTime in a very good investigative article with more passages scanned and shown, terrifying acts of Domestic terrorism conducted on US Soil by Ayers and the Weather Underground group.
ZombieTime put a lot of effort into their investigation, something one would expect the mainstream media to do, but of course they haven't.
Go look, read the whole thing.
Posted: 23 Oct 2008 07:39 AM CDT
A note from Radarsite: On reposting previously published articles: If the issues addressed in a previously published Radarsite article are still pertinent and the questions raised still remain unanswered, then we will repost the article, both as a reminder of unfinished business, and of course for those who may not have read the original. For those of you who have read this piece the first time around, just skip over it. Thanks. - rg
Can you smell it? There's a faint whiff of anarchy in the air. Nothing to get alarmed about. Not yet, anyway. Just a barely discernible unarticulated threat, a mere suggestion of a threat. But nonetheless it is there.
The voices are just whispers now, soft and faraway, but they are angry and determined: It is our time now, they are saying. You have had your time and you have used it to oppress us, to keep us down. But it is our time now. And you had better not interfere. For generations we have waited for this moment and we will not be deprived. It is our time now, and if you know what's good for you, you'd better step aside.
Of course, no one has actually come right out and said it quite this way, but there have been hints, there is something in the air. If Obama is not elected in November --
On his Fox News radio show, Tom Sullivan predicted that African-Americans would be rioting in the streets similar to what happened after the O.J. trial in the 1990s.
And these comments, all the way from India:
If Obama is not elected, it would destroy America because this time the blacks think that America has the best possible candidate that it has got the opportunity to elect as its president.
For those well-intentioned observers amongst us, this 2008 presidential race has nothing whatsoever to do with race. They are still trying their level best to convince us all of this. The unprecedented fact of Obama's blackness, and it's symbolic meaning to African-Americans and, as we are beginning to see, to people of color around the world is to simply be ignored. In fact, they confidently reassure us, an Obama presidency would prove to the world that race doesn't matter in America, that we have moved beyond all that, that we have deeply regretted our shameful past and are willing to make amends. It is after all Time for Change. Change we can believe in.
But the question still remains: will our November elections, whatever their outcome, be but another example of Democracy in action, or could they be the OJ Simpson trial writ large?
Does this election have anything at all to do with race?
We shall see.
Posted: 22 Oct 2008 01:44 PM CDT
We have often seen, written and posted about Democrats joining in with terrorists and al-Qaeda, siding with them, using their same arguments as if reading the same script and today we see it again.
The Washington Post writes a piece about al-Qaeda trying to scare American voters into voting for Barack Obama, by saying they want John McCain to win and connecting him to the financial crisis, even though Mccain was the one who proposed regulations for companies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Democrats opposed those restrictions, and what do the liberals in the blogosphere do?
The jump on the al-Qaeda bandwagon, joining them in their quest to get Obama elected.
"Al-Qaeda will have to support McCain in the coming election," said a commentary posted Monday on the extremist Web site al-Hesbah, which is closely linked to the terrorist group. It said the Arizona Republican would continue the "failing march of his predecessor," President Bush.
Quite amusing, one has to wonder is it al-Qaeda mimicking Democrats or Democrats mimicking al-Qaeda?
My heavens they are so predictable, both Liberals and al-Qaeda.
|You are subscribed to email updates from Wake up America |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner|
|If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: Wake up America, c/o FeedBurner, 20 W Kinzie, 9th Floor, Chicago IL USA 60610|